Please refer to the rubric and the samples, read your peer’s work and comment thoughtfully on what you think they did really well, and provide constructive suggestions on where you think they could improve.
Evaluation:
Your work will be evaluated according to the following criteria:
Excellent | Acceptable | Emerging | Not Evident | |
Basic Content: Identifying significant conventions and structures apparent in texts from different discourse communities | ||||
Analysis:Analyzing and comparing genre conventions and rhetorical strategies between texts from different discourse communities | ||||
Application:Reflecting on the ways genre is shaped by the rhetorically situated community in which it resides | ||||
Organization & Design: Purposeful rhetorical choices for the processes of analysis, organization, and drafting are evident and adapted to communicate in a professional context | ||||
Clarity:Sentences exhibit clear meaning that is easy to read | ||||
Professionalism:Attention totimeliness, formatting requirements, and submission protocols |