Aquinas” “Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theological” Michael Boylen

Does the relationship between natural law and social Darwinism surprise you? Why or why not?
May 16, 2021
What Christian versions of Natural Law concepts are present in the religious and political ideas of Augustine?
May 16, 2021

Aquinas” “Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theological” Michael Boylen

Question Description

First you should read Chapter 7 ” Aquinas” “Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theological” Michael Boylen

You will find it on page 111 on this text book https://b-ok.asia/book/2335620/b7292d .

There is a short story in this chapter, you should agree or disagree with his ideas, so the assignment is about writing 5 pages Pro or Con essay.

The “Pro” and “Con” Essay Format

Pro Essay (5 pages)

Pro Introduction: The author (fill in) argues for the following controversial conclusion: (give conclusion). He supports this conclusion with the following premises: (a) (give first premise) and (b) (give second premise). This essay will examine each premise in the light of objectors and then defend the author from these objections.

The possible objection to the first premise (give the objection(s)).

Reply to the first objection (give pointed reply).

The possible objection to the second premise (give the objection(s)).

Reply to the second objection (give pointed reply).

Theoretical observation (this is a broad theoretical groundwork upon which the whole argument rests)

Significance (this is a concrete example from the world in which these issues play out today).

-OR-

Con Essay (5 pages)

Con Introduction: The author (fill in) argues for the following controversial conclusion (give conclusion). He bases his argument on two objectionable premises: (a) (give first premise) and (b) (give second premise). It will be the contention of this essay that these premises are mistaken thus rendering the conclusion unproven.

Objection to the first premise (give objection).

Counter-refutation by the author (imagine how the author would respond to your objection)

Counter-refutation against the author (show how the author’s response is inadequate)

Objection to the second premise (give objection).

Counter-refutation by the author (imagine how the author would respond to your objection)

Counter-refutation against the author (show how the author’s response is inadequate)

Theoretical observation (this is a broad theoretical groundwork upon which the whole argument rests)

Significance (this is a concrete example from the world in which these issues play out today).