Case Study: Does the voluntary nature of her behavior mean she had “consented” to Taylor’s advances? Does it mean they were “welcome”?
Employee Training Plan.
August 18, 2019Evaluate the conduct of Peter Lewiston against the EEOC’s definition of sexual harassment
August 18, 2019Case Study: Does the voluntary nature of her behavior mean she had “consented” to Taylor’s advances? Does it mean they were “welcome”?
Question Description
Read Case 11.4: Consenting to Sexual Harassment, located on page 420 in your textbook, then respond to the following questions. According to her own testimony, Vinson acquiesced to Taylor’s sexual demands. In this sense, her behavior was “voluntary”.
Does the voluntary nature of her behavior mean she had “consented” to Taylor’s advances? Does it mean they were “welcome”? Do you agree that Vinson’s acquiescence shows there was no sexual harassment? Defend your position
