For this Assignment, you continue to develop your Community Needs Assessment by preparing a SWOT analysis for the initiative you proposed in Week 3.
To prepare for this Assignment, review your proposed initiative from Week 3.
The Assignment
Develop an 8- to 10-slide PowerPoint SWOT analysis presentation based on your proposed initiative from Week 3. In addition, include detailed speaker notes on each slide or a 2-page executive summary, submitted as a Word document.
Your presentation should include the following:
Rubric Detail
EXCELLENT – above expectations | GOOD – met expectations | FAIR – below expectations | POOR – significantly below expectations or missing | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Presentation Content: Synthesize key points related to a health initiative in a SWOT analysis |
27 (18%) – 30 (20%)
The presentation shows depth in critical thinking when addressing the key points of a health initiative in a SWOT analysis. |
24 (16%) – 26 (17.33%)
The presentation fully addresses the key points of a health initiative in a SWOT analysis. |
21 (14%) – 23 (15.33%)
The presentation lacks depth or clarity of the key points of a health initiative in a SWOT analysis. |
0 (0%) – 20 (13.33%)
The presentation does not address a health initiative in a SWOT analysis, is inaccurate, missing, or is of poor quality. |
Presentation Content: Explain the social and economic determinants of a community |
27 (18%) – 30 (20%)
The presentation shows depth in critical thinking in addressing the social and economic determinants of a community for a health initiative. |
24 (16%) – 26 (17.33%)
The presentation fully addresses the social and economic determinants of a community for a health initiative. |
21 (14%) – 23 (15.33%)
The presentation lacks depth or clarity of the social and economic determinants of a community for a health initiative. |
0 (0%) – 20 (13.33%)
The presentation does not address the social and economic determinants of a community for a health initiative, is inaccurate, missing, or is of poor quality. |
Presentation Content: Explain the direct and indirect costs associated with a health initiative |
27 (18%) – 30 (20%)
The presentation shows depth in critical thinking in addressing the direct and indirect costs associated with a health initiative for a community. |
24 (16%) – 26 (17.33%)
The presentation fully addresses the direct and indirect costs associated with a health initiative for a community. |
21 (14%) – 23 (15.33%)
The presentation lacks depth or clarity of the direct and indirect costs associated with a health initiative for a community. |
0 (0%) – 20 (13.33%)
The presentation does not address the direct and indirect costs associated with a health initiative for a community, is inaccurate, missing, or is of poor quality. |
Presentation Content: Executive Summary or detailed speaker notes for each slide of the presentation. |
27 (18%) – 30 (20%)
The Executive Summary shows depth of critical thinking in addressing the key points of the presentation associated with a health initiative for a community. |
24 (16%) – 26 (17.33%)
The Executive Summary fully addresses the key points of the presentation associated with a health initiative for a community. |
21 (14%) – 23 (15.33%)
The Executive Summary lacks depth or clarity in addressing the key points of the presentation associated with a health initiative for a community. |
0 (0%) – 20 (13.33%)
The Executive Summary does not address the key points of the presentation associated with a health initiative for a community. |
Presentation Required Elements | 9 (6%) – 10 (6.67%)
Presentation follows the Presentation Guidelines and Tips and uses more than four of the following items: text, color contrasts, photos, graphs, maps, websites, or visual elements to convey the information. |
8 (5.33%) – 8 (5.33%)
Presentation follows the Presentation Guidelines and Tips and uses three to four of the following items: text, color contrasts photos, graphs, maps, websites, or visual elements to convey the information. |
7 (4.67%) – 7 (4.67%)
Presentation uses only one or two of the following items: text, color contrasts photos, graphs, maps, websites, or visual elements to convey the information. |
0 (0%) – 6 (4%)
Presentation does not use any graphs, color contrasts, photos, or visuals, and information on slides is inadequate and hard to follow. |
Writing | 18 (12%) – 20 (13.33%)
Presentation is well organized, uses scholarly tone, contains original writing and proper paraphrasing, follows APA style, contains very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and is fully consistent with graduate level writing style. |
16 (10.67%) – 17 (11.33%)
Presentation is mostly consistent with graduate level writing style and may have some spelling, APA, and writing errors. |
14 (9.33%) – 15 (10%)
Presentation is somewhat consistent with graduate level writing style and may have some spelling, APA, and writing errors. |
0 (0%) – 13 (8.67%)
Presentation is well below graduate level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and writing, or shows heavy reliance on quoting. |