Comparison Essay: Analyzing Academic Publications

A Sample of Communication Behavior
April 17, 2023
Ensuring that Windows Networks are Secure
April 17, 2023

Comparison Essay: Analyzing Academic Publications

Comparison Essay: Analyzing Academic Publications
Typically, having the ability to analyze publications offers researchers and scholars an
opportunity to attain the main points of communication form. This ability also allows the
researchers to distinguish the verdict delivered by various texts and offers a suitable opportunity
to utilize the right ones as references. The aspect of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide is
among the significant clinical ethical issues. This has been the center of the discussion by the
American College of Physicians and the various researchers. This paper will analyze and
compare two euthanasia-based academic publications that include Physician-Assisted Suicide:
Finding a Path Forward in a Changing Legal Environment” by Quill et al. (2017) and The
Slippery Slope of Legalization of Physician-Assisted Suicide by Kussmaul (2017).
According to Quill et al. (2017), various arguments can be based on the process of
incorporating the law in physician-assisted care. One of the main arguments presented in this
article is that the patients would need to have control of their lives even when they are at the
point of a terminal illness. When a patient is sick, he or she may reach a point of extreme
suffering. The family members may also undergo psychological distress during this point due to
fear of their loved ones’ death. The aspect of treatment costs is also presented as one amongst
other elements that may further contribute to suffering. Therefore, the article posits that the
suffering triggers the patient’s need to have control even when they are not in the position to
make decisions. The patient determines the level of suffering and the quality of life, which
warrants and necessitates the process of euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide.
On the other hand, Kussmaul (2017) postulates an argument that is based on the aspect of
over-exercising the legalization of euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide. The article utilizes
the Netherlands’ case as an example, where physician-aided suicide was legalized, and