1. Is number a primary quality?
2. Are colour concepts response-dependent?
3. EITHER (a) Are possible worlds abstract representations of ways this
world might have been?
OR (b) ‘When I say that Hilary Clinton might have won, I mean that she
might have won, not that someone like her might have won. Therefore,
Lewis’s modal realism is false.’ Is this a good argument?
4. EITHER (a) ‘Water is a given phenomenon. Knowledge is not.’ Discuss.
OR (b) What would be lost if we attributed true belief in place of
knowledge?
5. What is justified belief?
6. Can you know that you have hands even if you cannot rule out that you
are a brain in a vat?
7. Does the time-lag argument refute naïve realism about perception?
8. EITHER (a) ‘There is no good reason for thinking that testimony is
reliable. So, we do not have much of the knowledge we think we have.’
Is this a good argument?
OR (b) Is suspension of judgement the correct way to respond to
disagreements among experts?
9. How is philosophical knowledge possible?
10. Is inductive inference rational?