Effective scholarly writing often uses the “They Say, I Say” model, in which you summarize and critique what other critics have said about your topic

Please respond to one of the following topics, using the class text and sources under the Explore heading as the basis of your response
June 30, 2019
How does Joyce Carol Oates foreshadow the events that befall Connie?
June 30, 2019

Effective scholarly writing often uses the “They Say, I Say” model, in which you summarize and critique what other critics have said about your topic

Question Description

This essay should argue for the literary, cultural, or political significance of one or more of the

course’s assigned texts; the topic is up to you. Please frame your argument as part of a larger intellectual conversation by citing at

least three relevant outside sources — e.g., book or film reviews, essays in “middlebrow”

publications (e.g., The Nation, New Republic, or National Review), or academic books or articles

(such as those found in the journal Critical Inquiry).

Effective scholarly writing often uses the “They Say, I Say” model, in which you summarize and

critique what other critics have said about your topic, then explain how your own understanding

differs from theirs, and finally defend your claims with an original, well-reasoned argument.

In The Philosophy of Literary Form, the literary theorist Kenneth Burke explains this dialogical

conception of literary study like this:

Imagine that you enter a parlor. You come late. When you arrive, others have long

preceded you, and they are engaged in a heated discussion, a discussion too heated

for them to pause and tell you exactly what it is about. In fact, the discussion had

already begun long before any of them got there, so that no one present is qualified

to retrace for you all the steps that had gone before. You listen for a while, until you

decide that you have caught the tenor of the argument; then you put in your oar.

Someone answers; you answer him; another comes to your defense; another aligns

himself against you, to either the embarrassment or gratification of your opponent,

depending upon the quality of your ally’s assistance. However, the discussion is

interminable. The hour grows late, you must depart. And you do depart, with the

discussion still vigorously in progress.

For practical guidance on joining this “unending conversation,” I recommend the book They Say,

I Say, by Gerald Graff and Cathy Birkenstein.

In your formal essay you should assume your audience is intelligent and reasonably well

informed, but not familiar with literary-critical jargon or the specific texts you will be discussing.

Length should be about 6-8 pages.

I expect your formal essay to be of corresponding

quality. In addition to clearly expressing and adequately supporting an original and significant

argument, it should make appropriate use of its sources and have no significant grammar or

spelling errors. It should use MLA style and format for intext

citations and Works Cited page.

Assigned Texts:

1. Michael Abrams, Glossary of Literary Terms (sixth edition or later)

2. Chinua Achebe, Things Fall Apart (ISBN: 0-44-920810-9)

3. Richard Brautigan, Trout Fishing in America (ISBN: 0-39-550076-1)

4. Willa Cather, O Pioneers! (ISBN: 0-48-627785-2)

5. Joseph Conrad, Heart of Darkness (ISBN: 0-48-626464-5)

6. Jonathan Culler, Literary Theory (ISBN: 0-19-285383-X)

7. F. Scott Fitzgerald, The Great Gatsby (ISBN: 0-02-019881-7)

8. Mary Shelley, Frankenstein (ISBN: 0-48-628211-2)

9. Lois Tyson, Critical Theory Today (ISBN: 0-81-532879-6)