Please write a 5-paragraph essay about how China and Japan changed their respective responses to foreign dominance between 1750 and 1900.

“Evaluate the extent to which response to foreign domination changed between c. 1750 and c. 1900 in the following: China and Japan.”

Please follow the rubric that I have attached below.

Please DO NOT cite your sources. Please contact me if you have questions.

istory | Graded Assignment | Long-Answer Essay: Reactions to Imperialism in Asia Name: Date: Graded Assignment Long-Answer Essay: Reactions to Imperialism in Asia Complete and submit this assignment by the due date to receive full credit. (Score: ___ of 45 points) Evaluate the extent to which response to foreign domination changed between c. 1750 and c. 1900 in any TWO of the following: the Ottoman Empire, China, India, or Japan. Type your essay here. © 2015 K12 Inc. All rights reserved. Copying or distributing without K12’s written consent is prohibited. Page 1 of 2 History | Graded Assignment | Long-Answer Essay: Reactions to Imperialism in Asia Scoring Your teacher may use the following rubric and scoring instructions to grade your response. POINTS Competency Required on the AP Exam 1 Has an acceptable thesis that directly addresses all parts of the question 2 Supports the stated thesis using specific evidence, clearly and consistently states how the evidence supports the thesis or argument, and establishes clear linkages between the evidence and the thesis or argument (1) (Supports the stated thesis using specific evidence) 2 (1) Describes similarities and differences among historical developments, and analyzes the reasons for the similarities and differences (Describes similarities and differences among historical developments) 1 Synthesizes the argument, evidence, and context into a coherent and persuasive essay To calculate the final grade for this assignment, your teacher will add the scores earned based upon the competencies required on the AP Exam together and multiply the total score by 7.5. AP Exam Competencies Score: ____ × 7.5 = ____ Total Score: ____ / 45 © 2015 K12 Inc. All rights reserved. Copying or distributing without K12’s written consent is prohibited. Page 2 of 2 AP History Long Essay Question Rubric AP History LEQ Rubric (6 points) Reporting Category Scoring Criteria Decision Rules A THESIS/CLAIM (0–1 pt) 1 pt. To earn this point, the thesis must make a claim that responds to the prompt, rather than merely restating or rephrasing the prompt. The thesis must consist of one or more sentences located in one place, either in the introduction or the conclusion. B CONTEXTUALIZATION (0–1 pt) 1 pt. To earn this point, the response must relate the topic of the prompt to broader historical events, developments, or processes that occur before, during, or continue after the time frame of the question. This point is not awarded for merely a phrase or a reference. C EVIDENCE (0–2 pts) 1 pt. D ANALYSIS AND REASONING (0–2 pts) © 2017 The College Board Responds to the prompt with a historically defensible thesis/claim that establishes a line of reasoning. Describes a broader historical context relevant to the prompt. Provides specific examples of evidence relevant to the topic of the prompt. 1 pt. Uses historical reasoning (e.g. comparison, causation, CCOT) to frame or structure an argument that addresses the prompt. OR OR 2 pts. Supports an argument in response to the prompt using specific and relevant examples of evidence. 2 pts. Demonstrates a complex understanding of the historical development that is the focus of the prompt, using evidence to corroborate, qualify, or modify an argument that addresses the question. To earn one point, the response must identify specific historical examples of evidence relevant to the topic of the prompt. To earn two points the response must use specific historical evidence to support an argument in response to the prompt. To earn the first point, the response must demonstrate the use of historical reasoning to frame or structure an argument, although the reasoning might be uneven or imbalanced. To earn the second point, the response must demonstrate a complex understanding. This can be accomplished in a variety of ways, such as:

• Explaining nuance of an issue by analyzing multiple variables

• Explaining both similarity and difference, or explaining both continuity and change, or explaining multiple causes, or explaining both causes and effects

• Explaining relevant and insightful connections within and across periods

• Confirming the validity of an argument by corroborating multiple perspectives across themes

• Qualifying or modifying an argument by considering diverse or alternative views or evidence This understanding must be part of the argument, not merely a phrase or reference.