In this assignment you will explore how interrogation is different from interviewing.
Scenario:
You work as a psychology professional for a metropolitan police department. Your primary job is to screen police officers for employment and emotional stability. You make recommendations about their suitability for employment conduct interviews with police officers to determine whether they should be referred for counseling and monitor their performance by dialogues with their superiors. You are recognized for your skills as a clinician and you are asked to participate with a team of interrogators so they may become more proficient in obtaining confessions from suspects.
Compare the relationship of a psychology professional working with a suspect as a client with the relationship of a psychology professional working as a consultant to an interrogator.
Tasks:
In a minimum of 300 words respond to the following:
Use the current version of the APA ethics code; choose elements of the ethical principles to explore issues such as do not harm informed consent use of assessment techniques by unqualified persons and resolving ethics code conflicts in an organization. Explore the following issues in the context of the scenario above:
Submission Details: