Not always an order from head office: Employee-initiated transfers

A discussion as to the extent to which there is a positive trade-off between the treatment of stakeholders in an equitable and fair manner and the achievement of higher rates of individual performance: An NGO and theory based approach
August 8, 2021
Employee retention rates: The impact of effective human resource planning
August 8, 2021

Not always an order from head office: Employee-initiated transfers

Example human resource management dissertation topic 14:

Not always an order from head office: Employee-initiated transfers

Employees increasingly see the global environment as offering improved opportunities for their families and may seek transfers abroad as part of that process. This study examines how companies deal with the employee who is keen to be transferred abroad, including how costs can be managed whilst ensuring employee retention. Further, it considers how responsible the transferring company is for ensuring the family of the employee is accepted abroad; are compounds the right environment for families, should accommodation be the responsibility of the company, and what should be done about employment opportunities for other family members such as spouses. Finally, it explores the degree to which this can cause a ‘brain-drain’ in the home country, as employees seek moves to overseas offices. As the world tightens working visas as a result of the global recession, this study offers a timely approach to a long-standing conundrum.

Suggested initial topic reading:

  • Al Ariss, A. (2010) ‘Modes of engagement: Migration, self-initiated expatriation, and career development’, Career Development International, Vol. 15(4), pp.338-358.
  • Howe-Walsh, L. and Schyns, B. (2010) ‘Self-initiated expatriation: Implications for HRM’, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 21(2), pp. 260-273.
  • Kononov, O. (2012) ‘Foreign investment v. employment of expatriates: Immigration obstacles for foreign investors’, East European Business Law Review, Vol. 10(10), pp. 45-78.