Various types of leaders

Global South” turned to socialism
December 30, 2022
Explain the importance of oral language development for families.
December 30, 2022

Various types of leaders

Description

Hello, i have a discussion that i need to be done . I explained everything below and i attached couple of files as well .

This graded discussion is based upon Chapter 5 in your textbook. Chapter 5 has a section on the various types of leaders (basically, someone who influences others) we see in society. It also talks about groupthinkwhich is essentially group pressure.

I want you to watch the short clip on the Stanford Prison Study and answer the following questions below, and yes, I want you to address all questions this week, think of it as one big question with three (1-3) components.

1) Look at all the different types of leaders found near the end of chapter 5. I want you to relate at least 3 types of leaders to the video. That is, explain where you see them present in the study. Be specific on why you see that style of leader in the video.

2) Next, I want you to compare and contrast your analysis with at least 2 of your fellow online classmates. That is, if you agree, why? If you disagree, why?

3) Chapter 5 also talked about groupthink. Where do you see groupthink present in the video? Give an example of it. Then compare your analysis with at least 2 of your online classmates.

Warning: There is graphic material (language & nudity) in this study/video clip.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xPO6BrFTsWM (Links to an external site.

make sure please to compare and contrast on these 2 people below:

A: first person

1. Dr. Zimbardo was an example of laissez faire since he was the leader of the experiment. He didn’t step in to stop or tell the guards or even the prisoners what they could or couldn’t do Dave one of the guards could be looked at as authoritarian leader since he started to make the guards look rougher. The guards were also giving orders to the prisoners so this would fit this type of leader. The prisoners looking to rebel could be looked at as instrumental leaders since they didn’t want to be looked down on and were fighting to get there rights back.

2. An example of group think in the video is when the one guard Dave starts to treat the prisoners in a cruel way just to see if he can and then the other guards followed in his footsteps.

B: second person

1. In the short clip on the Stanford Prison Experiment are different types of leadership like laissez-faire leader, authoritarian leader, and expressive leader. Dr. Philip Zimbardo a sociologist psychologist I believe he was an example of laissez-faire leader because he did not give clear rules to the people participating in the experiment, also he was allowing the guard and prisoner to freely make the decision how to behave. However, one individual can use more than just one type of leadership and Dr. Zimbardo was the case that was, authoritarian leader because he had the authority to start and to stop the experiment.

Dave Eshelman, which was the guard, was an example of authoritarian leader since he was most of the time giving orders and using his authority for evil. And the last one was Dr. Christina Maslach a social psychologist which I believe was the perfect example of expressive leader because she shows sympathy for the prisoners and remind Dr. Zimbardo group’s morale and why he was doing the experiment in the first place since he was influenced from the experiment and forgot that the goal of experiment was to help humans and not to torture.

2. The groupthink in this video is when the guard order the prisoners to chant for one individual how he was a bad prisoner. Richard Yacco which was one of the prisoners said, “at the time I went along with that I’m thinking what this matter, we don’t believe this, but we can go along and chanted.” That let me understand that even he believed was not true and wrong he went along with the group to fit in.

Rubric for Discussion. 10 Points total.

Criteria Excellent Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Did Not Post
Demonstrates knowledge & understanding of content Posts were well developed and ALL questions addressed.

3 pts.

Posts were developed and questions addressed.

2 pts.

Posts were made but did not address question asked.

1 pt.

No posts. No knowledge & understanding of content.

0 pts.

Engagement in discussion Responded to 2 classmate posts with follow up questions probing more discussion & creativity.

3 pt.

Responded to classmate posts with follow up questions.

2 pts.

Responded to classmate posts with no follow up questions.

1pt.

No posts. Did not engage.

0 pts.

Quantity of Responses/Replies Responded to ALL DQ & 2 participation responses.

3 pts.

Responded to 1 DQ & 1 participation response.

2 pts.

Responded to 1 DQ or 1 participation response.

1 pt.

No posts were made.

0 pts.

Clarity Responses were clear, understandable and free of grammatical errors.

1 pts.

Responses were clear with 1-3 grammatical errors.

.5 pts.

Response(s) was unclear and not understandable.

0 pt.

No posts were made.

0 pts.