Coleman win his wrongful termination suit with Software Inc.
The case of hiring the younger man.
September 26, 2019Constitutional Provisions that Apply to the President.
September 26, 2019Coleman win his wrongful termination suit with Software Inc.
Question Description
Questions
You are the judge in these cases! In your answer, discuss the relevant law and apply the facts given to that law. If you need more facts to come to a conclusion, state what additional facts are necessary. Answer the following questions:
A.Should Coleman win his wrongful termination suit with Software Inc.?
B.Will Software Inc. be liable to the owners of Jimmy’s bar?
C.What about Jimmy’s mom? Does the same law apply to both cases?
D.Will Software, Inc be liable for the ring that Coleman stole from the mall?
E.Will John win his lawsuit against Software Inc. for his injuries?
F.If you were Software Inc.’s CEO or head of HR, what policies would you implement to try to limit your liability for people such as Coleman?
Assignment
prepare an essay rendering your decisions. The components of a legal decision must include the following:
Factual Summary: provide a succinct and accurate description of the scenario at hand. Summarize the scenario to include all relevant facts.
Issue(s): Restatement or summarize the question. What is the legal question(s) that you are going to answer?
Legal Concept(s): Identify and discuss 1 or more legal concepts from the course material when exploring the problem at hand. Define the legal concept(s) and explain how the concept(s) relates to the given scenario.
Analysis/Conclusion: Analyze the factual scenario in relation to the legal concept in order to reach a well-reasoned conclusion. Be sure to apply the legal concept correctly toward solving the legal issue.
Paper should be double-spaced in 12pt font and about 800 words. At least 2 sources must be correctly cited to using APA citations, including both in-text parenthetical citations and an end-of-text list of references
Grading Rubric
| Category | Meets all Requirements(30 points) | Meets Most Requirements (25-15 points) | Meets Some Requirements (10-5 points) | Points Achieved &Comments |
| Factual Summary | Student gives a succinct and accurate description of the scenario. Student does an excellent job summarizing the scenario to include all relevant facts (5 points) | Student does a great job describing the scenario. Summary includes most of the relevant facts. (4-3 points) | Student does a good job describing the scenario. Some of the relevant facts are included. (2-1 points) | |
| Identifying the Legal Issue(s) Presented | Student has done an excellent job identifying the Legal Issue(s) by clearly restating or summarizing the question(s) to be answered through legal and factual analysis (6 points) | Student has done a good job identifying the Legal Issue(s), but could have more clearly restated or summarized the question(s) to be answered through legal and factual analysis. (5-3 points) | Student did not fully restate or summarize the question(s) to be answered through legal and factual analysis. (2-1 points) | |
| Legal Concepts | Student has thoroughly discussed one or more legal concepts from the course material when exploring the problem at hand. Student has correctly defined the legal concept(s) and explained how the concept(s) relates to the given scenario. (6 points) | Student does a great job discussing at least one of the legal concepts from the course material, but could have more thoroughly defined the legal concept(s) and explained how the concept(s) relate to the given scenario. (5-3 points) | Student does not fully discuss at least one of the legal concepts from the course material and does not fully explain how the concept relates to the given scenario. (2-1 points) | |
| Analysis/Conclusion | Student has clearly demonstrated an in-depth understanding of the task at hand by correctly and thoroughly analyzing the factual scenario in relation to the legal concept in order to reach a well-reasoned conclusion. The analysis is logical and the student does an excellent job applying the legal concept correctly toward solving the legal issue. (7 points) | Student has done a good job demonstrating an understanding of the task at hand, but could have more thoroughly analyzed the factual scenario in relation to the legal concept in order to reach a well-reasoned conclusion. The student could have further demonstrated a logical analysis of the legal concept toward solving the legal issue.(6-3 points) | Student did not demonstrate a thorough understanding of the task had hand by not thoroughly analyzing the factual scenario in relation to the legal concept. Student did not reach a well-reasoned conclusion.(2-1 points) | |
| Format | Student meets all formatting requirements. Paper is double-spaced in 12pt font and is approximately 800 words. At least two sources have been cited to correctly using APA citations, both in-text parenthetical citations and an end-of-text list of references. Paper has no grammar or spelling problems and is well-written. Paragraph transitions are present and logical and flow is maintained throughout the response. Sentences are complete, clear, and concise. (6 points) | Student meets most formatting requirements. Paper is double-spaced in 12pt font and is 800 or almost 800 words. One to two sources have been cited to using fairly accurate APA formatting.
Paper has few grammar or spelling problems and is fairly well-written. Paragraph transitions are mostly present and logical and a good flow is maintained throughout most of the response. Sentences are mostly complete, clear, and concise. (5-3 points) |
Student has not substantially complied with formatting requirements. Paper may have major grammar or spelling problems and is not well-written. Student may not have cited to at least 1 source in APA format. Some paragraph transitions are present, but response lacks logic and flow throughout. Some sentences are complete, clear, and concise. (2-1 points) |
